Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Associations Collected Parking Fees from Petitioners and Lawyers on Their Premises
2 mins read

Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Associations Collected Parking Fees from Petitioners and Lawyers on Their Premises

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed that any litigant, lawyer, etc. who parks their vehicles on its premises. He issued a restraining order directing that the person not be charged.

A dividing bench Chief Justice Sheel Nagu And Judge Anil KshetarpaI said, “This Court has passed a prohibitory order stating that henceforth parking fee will not be collected from any litigant, employee, government official, Lawyer etc. visiting the High Court.

The court further said that any violation of this order will be considered a Breach of Court.

These observations were made during the hearing of the PIL filed by Prithvi Raj Yadav, who stated that parking fees were being collected by the Punjab and Haryana Bar Association from Advocates, government officials, litigants and also employees of this Supreme Court for parking their vehicles. In the Supreme Court building.

A parking voucher of Rs 50 was presented to the court. However, the Court noted that the name of the person making or receiving the payment was not specified.

The division bench was of the opinion that: “No parking fee can be charged on the High Court premises without the permission of the UT-Chandigarh Administration and the High Court.

While listing the matter for November 8, the court directed that the order be forwarded to the President of the Punjab and Haryana Bar Association, the Attorney Generals of both Punjab and Haryana States and also the President of the Punjab and Haryana Employees Association. Haryana.

The PIL also relates to the alleged illegal encroachment of the Supreme Court premises for commercial activities.

Yadav claimed that rape could pose a threat to the “environment” and “national security”:More than 100 Steel Iron boxes are lying open for the purpose of carrying out commercial activities which can be used by any anti-national force for easy planting of any explosive device.

Mr. Prithvi Raj-applicant personally.

Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl. Attorney General of India with Mr. Narender Kumar Vashisth, Senior Panel Counsel for the respondent UOI.

Mr. Vipul Goel, Advocate (Executive Member) of Punjab Bar Association and Haryana High Court.

Mr. Hassan Thakur, Advocate for Ms. Diya Sodhi, Advocate for respondent no.5.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate and Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Amit Jhanji, Senior Standing Counsel to Mr. J.S.Chandail, Addl. UT Chandigarh Standing Advocate, respondents Nos.2, 4 and 6.

Mr. Swaran Singh Tiwana, Advocate, Secretary, Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association.

Title: Prithvi Raj Yadav v. Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh and others

Click here to read/download the order